Policy Archives - Page 11 of 11 - Shared Hope International

January 19, 2016 by Guest

Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission Briefing – Human Trafficking

Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission Briefing
In Conjunction With Exodus Cry and Shared Hope International

The Demand Factor in the Global Sex Trade:
Human Trafficking as a Human Rights Crisis

This event is in the past. Please watch the video above or read the transcript.

Tuesday, March 1, 2016

2255 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, D.C.

Please join the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission for a briefing on how the demand for commercial sex fuels the global human trafficking industry, perpetuating a human rights crisis.

International sex trafficking represents a serious human rights crisis affecting millions of people, primarily women and girls. It is a nefarious enterprise that generates nearly $100 billion in revenue annually worldwide.

The sexual exploitation that undergirds the industry is perpetrated by two key players: the trafficker (“pimp”) and the buyer (“john”). To downplay the role of either is a failure to grasp the basic dynamic of human trafficking. Yet, the buyer is often viewed through a lens of tolerance or even ignored, his actions tempered by cultural permissiveness or protected by outright legalization. Research has revealed that legalization or decriminalization of the purchase of commercial sex serves to drive the demand for sex trafficking and encourages buyers. By removing criminality along with the associated stigma, buyers experience few consequences and thus perpetuate their actions. A flourishing market in the trafficking of women and children develops to meet unsatisfied interests of buyers in the legal realm. Demand for commercial sex drives human trafficking and presents a dire human rights crisis for those who are violated and exploited.

The United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime of 2000 expressly addresses the requirement that nations make serious efforts to reduce demand for trafficked persons. Article nine, addressing prevention of human trafficking specifically directs that, “States Parties shall adopt or strengthen legislative or other measures, such as educational, social or cultural measures, including through bilateral and multilateral cooperation, to discourage the demand that fosters all forms of exploitation of persons, especially women and children, that leads to trafficking.”

Please join us to hear from experts on the frontlines in the fight against human trafficking as they discuss the danger caused by purchasers and purveyors of commercial sex and successful efforts employed to combat demand.

Panelists

Taina Bien-Aimé, Executive Director, Coalition Against Trafficking in Women (CATW)
Ernie Allen, Allen Global Consulting
Rev. Dr. Marian Hatcher, Senior Project Manager/Human Trafficking Coordinator
Attorney General Sam Olens, Georgia
Kubiiki Pride, mother of a sex trafficking survivor and advocate against sexual exploitation of women and children

Moderator

Rep. Randy Hultgren, Executive Committee, Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission

The briefing will be open to members of Congress, congressional staff, the interested public and the media.

The Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission is the largest bipartisan and bicameral congressional human rights working group, which was founded by the late Congressman Tom Lantos (D-CA) and retired Congressman John Edward Porter (R-IL) in 1983. The mission of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission is to promote, defend and advocate internationally recognized human rights norms in a nonpartisan manner, both within and outside of Congress.

December 7, 2015 by Guest

Exchanging Food for Sex with Children Amounts to Sex Trafficking

Society is quickly outraged by reports that peacekeepers or aid workers have sexually exploited children in areas of conflict or developing regions. This year, reports surfaced that peacekeepers in the Central African Republic elicited sex acts with young boys in exchange for food. Unfortunately, this scenario is not new. A 1996 study from the UN Secretary-General stated:

Children may also become victims of prostitution following the arrival of peacekeeping forces. In Mozambique, after the signing of the peace treaty in 1992, soldiers of the United Nations Operation in Mozambique (ONUMOZ) recruited girls aged 12 to 18 years into prostitution. After a commission of inquiry confirmed the allegations, the soldiers implicated were sent home. In 6 out of 12 country studies on sexual exploitation of children in situations of armed conflict …, the arrival of peacekeeping troops has been associated with a rapid rise in child prostitution.

When peacekeepers instruct hungry children living in war-torn countries, to perform sexual acts in order to receive life necessities, this resonates with many readers in America as patently exploitative and abusive. In fact, should such an exchange – sex with a minor for life necessities – occur in the United States, this commercial sexual exploitation by a buyer could amount to sex trafficking, under federal law and the sex trafficking law in 41 states and the District of Columbia.[1] Appropriately including the purchase of sex with a minor within sex trafficking definitions reflects the seriousness of this exploitative conduct.

Nonetheless, outrage like that expressed in response to peackeepers’ abuse, does not similarly resound when adults exchange life necessities for sex with minors in the United States. Instead, domestic children induced to perform a sexual act in exchange for food or transportation, or maybe as a form of “rent,” are often blamed for their own victimization. In fact, in 36 states, commercially sexually exploited children may be prosecuted for prostitution and are stigmatized as “prostitutes.” Why is moral or criminal fault assigned to a child who is sexually exploited, sometimes in order to survive?

In these scenarios, the buyer is the manipulator and offender, not the youth. In fact, in instances of sex trafficking, the buyer is the indispensable perpetrator, even more so than a possible trafficker. Without the buyer, there would be no commercial sexual exploitation, at all. However, sex trafficking often is still viewed as requiring a “pimp” or trafficker who controls the child victim. Accordingly, the sex trafficking laws in 14 states, unfortunately, do not accurately reflect the central role of the buyer-perpetrator; these states require the presence of a trafficker or third party control over minor victims.[2] A policy paper by Shared Hope, Eliminating the Third Party Control Barrier to Identifying Juvenile Sex Trafficking Victims, discusses social misperceptions and legal inconsistencies that result from misunderstanding the buyer’s central role and requiring that a trafficker be named. One devastating effect is that many juvenile sex trafficking victims are not identified, nor provided much needed services.

Buyers who prey on vulnerable children by withholding life necessities in exchange for sex should be held accountable. This conduct needs to be understood as the manipulation and exploitation that it is and included within sex trafficking definitions.

——————————————————————————–

[1] Statistic based on laws enacted as of August 1, 2014.

[2] Statistic based on laws enacted as of August 1, 2014.

August 22, 2014 by Guest

Demanding Justice in Congress

While we often talk about human trafficking, there’s one important aspect that we often ignore: the man who solicits sex on the street or on the internet. These individuals are also criminals, and they live among us every day, preying on young women and girls. They are the demand that drives this business, because that is what it is, just business, not human lives. To them, these girls are property. In order to end modern day slavery in our society, we must end demand.

If the guys who buy sex from young girls merely get a slap on the wrist (that is, if they receive any punishment at all), this horrific crime will continue. These men are not “johns,” they are child abusers and must be treated as such.

That is why the House of Representatives unanimously passed the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act, a bipartisan bill I introduced with Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) that, among other things, ensures that buyers can be prosecuted under federal law. The legislation strengthens and clarifies the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) by making it absolutely clear for judges, juries, prosecutors, and law enforcement officials that criminals who solicit or patronize sexual acts from trafficking victims can and should be arrested, prosecuted, and convicted as sex trafficking offenders.

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals got it right when they determined that buyers commit the crime of sex trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 in U.S. v. Jungers and U.S. v. Bonestroo. JVTA clarifies and strengthens the law so that more prosecutors will decide to aggressively go after buyers and so law enforcement will be encouraged to arrest them. In addition, the bill calls for the U.S. Attorney General to ensure that all task forces and the Innocence Lost National Initiative working groups get involved by engaging in activities and operations to increase investigations and prosecutions of buyers. It is time for the Senate to pass the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act.

Most of these abusers are never prosecuted; many are not even arrested. We cannot continue to let predators go free. It’s time to get serious and end demand.

And that’s just the way it is.